The music industry really pisses me off. Let me explain the many reasons why.
First, let me make it perfectly clear that I have no objection at all to anyone making a fair profit from his or her endeavors. I do take issue with “maximizing” those profits, however. When one attempts to maximize profits details like morality, humanity and honesty often seem to be overlooked in the search for another dollar.
After a fifty year history of trying to force on the public whatever crap was the most profitable to themselves (remember payola and all those lawsuits to recover artist’s and composer’s unfairly withheld revenue), recording companies saw in the Internet a real threat to their stranglehold on our ears.
Streaming Internet “radio” stations and podcasts were a real threat to the companies’ status quo because the cheeky bastards on the Internet were actually playing what they (and apparently the public) wanted to hear, instead of following the “list”. Having paid big money to determine the content of the “list”, the companies saw red—ink that is.
So, what else would you expect from the folks who think it is a good business practice to:
- Randomly sue their 12 tear old customers (P2P file sharing)
- Try to kill a medium that brought the first excitement to the industry in decades (Burning mix CDs)
- Attempt to shut down a medium that held the promise for the growth of the industry beyond a few huge companies (Streaming audio)
- Attempt to shut down a source of news about, and a showcase for music samples by, new artists and composers. (Podcasts)
Fortunately, Internet delivered free music got a temporary reprieve on Friday. What happens next depends on whether you demonstrate your disgust with maximized profits in all industries by holding your elected representatives in Washington’s toes to the fire and how you vote in the next Federal election.
I suggest that you read this complete article about the delay in overcharging Internet music programmers that appeared in the New York Times.